How Audience Has Shaped Black Autobiography

Images of Harriet Jacobs and Booker T. Washington respectively.

When reading any literary work, understanding the audience the author intended to reach reveals fresh layers of meaning. In Jacobs’s Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl she clearly indicates through the preface that she is writing for a specific audience: white northern women. Booker T. Washington, by contrast, intended his autobiography Up from Slavery to reach a somewhat broader audience, though it was still largely shaped by white readers’ expectations. By analyzing both texts we see how the differences in audience lead to either emphasis on particular ideas or sanitization of certain experiences from slavery. While both Harriet Jacobs and Booker T. Washington shape their narratives around white audiences, Jacobs exposes the emotional and moral horrors of slavery to elicit sympathy and provoke Northern women into action, whereas Washington strategically edits and moralizes his experiences to reassure white readers and present himself and his race as beneficiaries of slavery. In both cases the audience plays an important role in shaping Black autobiography.

The preface in Life of a Slave Girl explicitly states who the work is meant for. “I do earnestly desire to arouse the women of the North to a realizing sense of the condition of two millions of women in the South, still in bondage and suffering what I suffered and most of them far worse.” Throughout the narrative she describes the abrupt transition from girlhood to womanhood, and how physiological torture followed. While she does include accounts of physical brutality inflicted on others, such as the enslaved man who was force-fed dog food, she focuses more heavily on the internal effects of slavery on herself, particularly as a Christian woman and later as a mother. On page 28 Jacobs writes, “Soon she will learn to tremble when she hears her master’s footfall. She will be compelled to realize that she is no longer a child…” Slave or not, feeling uncomfortable amongst certain men was probably a widely shared experience amongst women at that time. As Brent tells her story she tiptoes the line between garnering sympathy and alienating white readers. On page 51 she states, “I feel that the slave women ought not to be judged by the same standard as others.” Jacobs attempts to preserve Christian sympathy while explaining the morally impossible choices she was forced to make as a young enslaved woman. As Brent’s story develops she often writes about yearning to be with her children, an experience many women and mothers could probably sympathize with. When she finally makes it to the North she calls them out for their complicity “…Northern soil, but I no longer called it free soil.” Instead of enjoying the rest of her life with her children in peace, she lives in constant fear until she is bought and freed. In conclusion, she relies on shared womanhood and motherhood to bridge the racial gap.


The image above captures Booker T. Washington delivering his Atlanta address.

    Although Washington's story was written for a wider audience, it was still carefully edited for white audiences. Throughout his writing it feels as if he was under constant pressure to prove himself to the white people, many of whom came for the entertainment of watching him fail at his Atlanta address. He wrote about his life through a highly retrospective lens aimed at proving his worthiness as a good black person. He details the strife he went through just to learn how to read. But perhaps the most salient example is his description of a childhood hat. He could have said that he begged his mom for a hat so he could fit in at school with the other boys. Instead, he turns it into a life lesson about only taking what you deserve. He disparaged the boys that spend money on store bought hats, saying that buying something they didn’t have enough money for and therefore didn’t earn later landed them in prison. Indeed, it was his willingness to wear a scrappy homemade hat that gave him value. He is willing to cast down his bucket where it lands and not desire more for his race or himself as a member of it. Throughout, he refers to black people as “members of my race,” attempting to form a group identity around being a good black person who will take what they are given and be grateful for the skills learned during slavery. He frames racism and injustice as obstacles to overcome rather than systems to confront. Washington’s insistence on respectability and self-denial can be read as a survival strategy in a violently racist society. However, this strategy comes at the cost of reinforcing white comfort, requiring Black people to police themselves in order to be deemed worthy of basic respect. However, from reading this piece it seems like he really believed most of what he said. In catering his narrative to white audiences, Washington transforms Black suffering into proof of moral virtue rather than evidence of injustice.

While we will never know the private beliefs of either Harriet Jacobs or Booker T. Washington, their narratives clearly demonstrate how the audience can affect literary work under oppression. Jacobs navigate a careful balance between blaming the white race for her torture and cultivating thier sympathy. She emphasizes her womanhood and motherhood to demand moral reckoning. Washington, writing with the knowledge people wanted him to fail, shaped black suffering into evidence of discipline and progress. These texts both demonstrate that autobiographies are never neutral accounts, especially in times of oppression. Instead they aim to negotiate the terms and expectations in the white and black relations. Understanding their audience tells us not only what they wished to express explicitly, but also what they were forced to withhold.

Thanks for reading,

-Sasha


Works Cited

Jacobs, Harriet A. (Harriet Ann), 1813-1897. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl : Written by Herself. 

Washington, Booker T. Up from Slavery. Dover Publications, 1995.



Comments

  1. Hi Sasha,
    I agree, the audiences shaped how the stories were written. BTW wanted to appeal to a white audience as did Harriet, but he seemed to lessen the impact of slavery. Harriet Jacobs did no such thing, and illustrated every bad deed that her owners had done, but too wanted to appeal to white audiences in the North. I like your points about womanhood and motherhood for Harriet Jacobs, and uses this to appeal to audiences. Great post!
    -Connor

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Sasha!
    I wrote my blog also on how audiences shaped autobiographies, and I agree with much of what you said. I think it's interesting the point you brought up about how Jacobs toed the line between blaming and eliciting sympathy from white audiences. I had not previously thought about how Jacobs would also have had to censor her work to keep white audiences unoffended. Your blog was really well written; good job!
    Emma

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Sasha, I definitely agree that the intended audience for the literature being produced has significant impacts on the writing topic. Especially with Booker T. Washington, he curates his story to highlight the American dream of working hard in order to succeed, which places the blame not on the white people who he's trying to win over, but on the black people for not working hard enough. I think in the end all literature produced has an end goal, and your blog does a good job getting at that message.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Sasha, I totally agree that understanding the targeted audience allows to deeper understand the reading. Especially in how Jacobs used the shared experience of motherhood to force Northern white women to see her humanity. However, I’d disagree that Washington was simply trying to "reassure" white readers. It feels more like he was using respectability politics as a tactical shield to protect Black progress during an extremely violent era.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Sasha, it's so interesting to realize how Jacobs and BTW structure their story to appeal to different audiences. I like the contrast between Jacobs' story of not explicitly criticizing the white audience and BTW's obvious criticism of the lazy black audience. While both stories give different messages, they share a similar approach to connect with their audience.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello Sasha,
    I agree with your interpretation on how both Jacobs and BTW aimed for white readers to view both their stories and the African American community in a more positive light, whether that be in a more sympathetic manner or in the form of approval. I also like that you point out that in both cases, the means used to achieve the appeal to white audiences also hid the more negative parts of their experience that would not be relatable to them. Your points about how BTW's autobiography was framed to carefully portray himself as a hard worker specifically in anticipation for later public speeches was something I had not initially thought about when I read it. Great job on this post!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Sasha, I liked your deep dive into the audiences of the two stories, and I think it's also interesting how another audience reacted to these stories: normal African Americans. While not all of them might have been able to read these stories, these stories were likely well known to them, and I wonder how they reacted to these stories being written very explicitly for certain audiences. Maybe they felt a sense of abandonment, or maybe they understood that this was the way for their struggles to be addressed, by appealing to whites. Overall, nice post!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Sasha! I loved how you chose to dive deeper into the ways Jacobs and BTW decide to shape their narrative for the white people. I definitely saw this way of censoring and making sure that their autobiographies would reach their intended audiences and impact them in the way they wished when reading in class, and I think you were really able to show that editing. I also thought it was interesting the different hardships they chose to focus on, especially Jacobs' narrative being directed to women, written by a woman. I especially liked the way you summed up your post by directing attention to how we can see what their beliefs were by what they shared and what they were holding back from the audience.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Sasha! I definitely think it's interesting that both Jacobs' and Washington's storytelling was altered as a result of their audience. I like how you pointed out that Jacobs had to avoid directly blaming the white race for slavery -- she was trying to garner understanding and sympathy, and pointing fingers wouldn't accomplish that in her opinion. I also think it's interesting that Washington put down some African American people to then further appeal to white people. Blaming others for buying store-bought hats is exactly what Jacobs wanted to avoid, but self-denial was Washington's goal, as you said. Overall, great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Call For Real Choices: Richard Wright's “Down by the Riverside”